Knowledge generated from half-Ironman distance triathlons supplies a wealth of knowledge for athletes and fans. These competitions, encompassing a 1.2-mile swim, a 56-mile bike trip, and a 13.1-mile run, produce ending instances, break up instances for every leg, and total rankings for particular person age teams {and professional} classes. This knowledge typically contains each total and gender-specific rankings.
Entry to this aggressive knowledge gives athletes precious insights into private efficiency, permitting for evaluation of strengths and weaknesses throughout the three disciplines. It additionally supplies benchmarks for enchancment and facilitates comparisons with different opponents. The historic monitoring of those outcomes contributes to a deeper understanding of the game’s evolution, highlighting enhancements in coaching methodologies, gear developments, and total athletic efficiency. The info can be helpful for spectators, coaches, and analysts excited about following the progress of elite athletes and observing traits throughout the sport.
Additional exploration of particular race knowledge, athlete profiles, and analytical instruments can present a richer understanding of the components influencing efficiency in these demanding occasions. Discussions of coaching methods, dietary concerns, and technological developments will comply with.
1. Ending Occasions
Ending instances signify a vital element of Ironman 70.3 outcomes, serving as the first metric for evaluating athlete efficiency and figuring out total race standings. A complete understanding of ending instances requires consideration of a number of key aspects.
-
General Ending Time
This represents the whole time taken to finish all three disciplines: swim, bike, and run, together with transitions. It serves as the premise for total rankings and is a key indicator of an athlete’s total health and pacing technique. For instance, a ending time of 4:30:00 signifies the athlete accomplished the complete 70.3-mile course in 4 hours and thirty minutes. Analyzing total ending instances throughout totally different races can reveal an athlete’s progress and consistency.
-
Age Group Ending Time
Ironman 70.3 occasions categorize athletes into age teams, permitting for comparability inside particular demographics. Age group ending instances present a extra nuanced view of efficiency, permitting athletes to benchmark themselves towards friends. A quick total time may nonetheless place an athlete decrease in a extremely aggressive age group.
-
Gender Ending Time
Just like age group rankings, gender-specific ending instances supply a comparative lens for analyzing efficiency inside female and male classes. This permits for evaluation of efficiency traits and disparities between genders.
-
Percentile Rating Primarily based on Ending Time
Whereas uncooked ending instances present a measure of efficiency, percentile rankings supply a precious contextualization of those instances throughout the broader area of opponents. A ninetieth percentile end, for instance, signifies that the athlete carried out higher than 90% of the members. This metric permits for a extra standardized comparability throughout totally different races with various area sizes and aggressive ranges.
Analyzing these totally different aspects of ending instances supplies a extra full understanding of an athlete’s efficiency throughout the context of Ironman 70.3 outcomes. By contemplating total, age group, gender, and percentile rankings, athletes can achieve precious insights into their strengths, weaknesses, and areas for potential enchancment. These knowledge factors additionally contribute to the broader narrative of the race, highlighting prime performers and total traits throughout the sport.
2. Age Group Rankings
Age group rankings signify a vital element of Ironman 70.3 outcomes, offering a nuanced perspective on athlete efficiency inside particular age demographics. These rankings are decided by evaluating ending instances inside predetermined age brackets, usually spanning five-year increments (e.g., 25-29, 30-34, and so forth.). This stratification permits athletes to gauge their efficiency relative to friends of comparable age and physiological capability. Analyzing age group rankings gives precious insights into aggressive landscapes and particular person progress over time.
The significance of age group rankings stems from the inherent physiological variations throughout age teams. A 40-year-old athlete may obtain a slower total time than a 25-year-old, but nonetheless attain the next age group rating. This distinction highlights the relative nature of efficiency in endurance sports activities. As an illustration, an athlete ending within the prime 10% of their age group demonstrates a excessive degree of efficiency even when their total time would not place them among the many prime finishers. This deal with relative efficiency fosters a extra inclusive and motivating aggressive surroundings throughout the sport. Actual-world examples abound, resembling an athlete persistently putting within the prime three of their age group at native races however aspiring to qualify for the World Championship by way of constant prime performances.
Understanding age group rankings has sensible significance for athletes searching for to benchmark progress, determine lifelike targets, and qualify for championship occasions. Many Ironman 70.3 races allocate qualifying slots primarily based on age group efficiency. Due to this fact, specializing in age group rankings turns into essential for athletes aiming to compete at larger ranges. Moreover, monitoring age group efficiency over a number of races supplies precious longitudinal knowledge for analyzing coaching effectiveness and figuring out areas for enchancment. Whereas total instances supply a common measure of efficiency, age group rankings supply a extra focused and significant evaluation throughout the context of particular person age and aggressive targets.
3. Gender Rankings
Gender rankings inside Ironman 70.3 outcomes present a vital lens for analyzing efficiency disparities and traits between female and male athletes. This segmentation permits for a extra centered comparability, acknowledging physiological variations and selling truthful competitors inside respective classes. Analyzing gender-specific rankings gives precious insights into the evolving panorama of the game and highlights achievements inside every gender.
-
General Gender Rankings
These rankings mirror the ending instances of all feminine and male members individually, offering a broad overview of efficiency throughout the complete area. Analyzing these rankings can reveal total participation charges and determine top-performing athletes inside every gender. As an illustration, evaluating the highest feminine and male ending instances can spotlight the efficiency hole, whereas monitoring these instances over a number of years reveals whether or not this hole is narrowing or widening.
-
Age Group Gender Rankings
Additional segmenting outcomes by age group inside every gender permits for extra focused evaluation. This reveals aggressive landscapes inside particular demographics. For instance, a feminine athlete may end mid-pack total however rank extremely inside her age group, demonstrating sturdy efficiency relative to her friends. This granular view permits for extra significant comparisons and highlights particular person achievements inside particular age brackets.
-
Skilled Gender Rankings
In skilled Ironman 70.3 races, separate rankings for female and male professionals supply insights into the elite ranges of the game. Analyzing these rankings can reveal dominance patterns, rising expertise, and efficiency traits on the highest echelons of competitors. Monitoring skilled gender rankings over time contributes to a deeper understanding of the game’s evolution and the growing competitiveness inside feminine skilled fields.
-
Gender-Particular Efficiency Traits
Analyzing gender rankings throughout a number of races and years can illuminate broader traits in efficiency. For instance, an growing variety of feminine athletes qualifying for the World Championship may point out progress in feminine participation and improved efficiency on the elite degree. These traits supply precious insights into the event of the game and the evolving roles of gender inside it.
By contemplating these totally different aspects of gender rankings, a extra full understanding of efficiency inside Ironman 70.3 races emerges. This evaluation not solely acknowledges achievements inside every gender but in addition supplies essential knowledge for figuring out areas of progress and selling fairness throughout the sport. Additional analysis may discover the physiological and sociological components contributing to efficiency variations and the influence of coaching methodologies on gender-specific outcomes.
4. Break up instances (swim)
Swim break up instances signify a vital element of Ironman 70.3 outcomes, offering a granular view of athlete efficiency within the preliminary leg of the race. Analyzing swim splits gives precious insights into pacing methods, open-water expertise, and total race outcomes. Understanding these instances is crucial for athletes searching for to optimize efficiency and determine areas for enchancment.
-
Impression on General Time
Swim break up instances immediately affect total race outcomes. A sooner swim can set up an early benefit, probably resulting in improved total ending instances. Conversely, a slower swim may require athletes to exert extra effort in subsequent disciplines to catch up, probably impacting total efficiency. As an illustration, a robust swimmer finishing the swim in 25 minutes positive factors a major benefit over a competitor ending in 40 minutes, requiring the latter to make up quarter-hour throughout the bike and run segments.
-
Pacing Technique in Open Water
Analyzing swim splits reveals pacing methods adopted by athletes. Constant splits counsel a well-maintained tempo, whereas fluctuating splits may point out challenges with navigating currents, managing fatigue, or adjusting to open-water circumstances. Athletes can analyze their swim splits to determine durations of inefficiency and modify pacing methods accordingly. An instance contains an athlete with persistently sooner splits within the first half of the swim adopted by slower splits, suggesting potential points with pacing or fatigue administration within the later levels.
-
Correlation with Bike and Run Splits
Analyzing swim splits in relation to bike and run splits supplies insights into how efficiency in a single self-discipline influences subsequent disciplines. A quick swim adopted by sturdy bike and run splits signifies a well-rounded efficiency. Conversely, a sluggish swim adopted by slower bike and run splits may counsel underlying health limitations or strategic errors. This correlation helps athletes determine areas for enchancment throughout all three disciplines.
-
Impression of Exterior Components
Swim splits might be influenced by exterior components resembling water temperature, currents, and wave circumstances. Analyzing swim splits throughout totally different races with various circumstances supplies insights into how exterior components influence efficiency. For instance, slower swim splits in a race with sturdy currents in comparison with a calmer race may point out a necessity to enhance open-water expertise in difficult circumstances.
By analyzing these aspects of swim break up instances, athletes achieve a deeper understanding of their strengths and weaknesses throughout the context of Ironman 70.3 outcomes. These insights inform coaching selections, pacing methods, and total race preparation, finally contributing to improved efficiency. Additional evaluation may discover the correlation between swim coaching quantity and swim break up instances, offering further insights into coaching optimization.
5. Break up instances (bike)
Biking efficiency considerably influences total Ironman 70.3 outcomes. The 56-mile bike leg typically represents the most important time element of the race, making bike break up evaluation essential for understanding total efficiency and figuring out areas for enchancment. Bike splits, representing the time taken to finish the biking leg, supply precious insights into pacing methods, energy output, and the influence of exterior components like terrain and wind circumstances. A powerful bike break up can set up a major benefit heading into the run, whereas a weaker efficiency can necessitate larger exertion within the ultimate leg to attain desired outcomes.
Analyzing bike splits reveals a number of key elements of efficiency. Constant splits counsel efficient pacing and energy administration, whereas fluctuating splits may point out challenges with sustaining constant effort, navigating various terrain, or coping with headwinds or tailwinds. Evaluating bike splits towards total outcomes supplies insights into the correlation between biking efficiency and total race success. For instance, an athlete with a top-quartile bike break up however a decrease total rating may determine the run as an space requiring centered coaching. Conversely, a robust run efficiency coupled with a slower bike break up highlights the potential for enchancment in biking effectivity and energy output. Analyzing skilled athletes’ bike splits typically reveals aggressive pacing methods early within the bike leg, adopted by a extra measured method to preserve power for the run. This underscores the strategic significance of pacing and energy administration all through the bike leg.
Understanding the affect of motorcycle splits on total Ironman 70.3 outcomes permits athletes to develop focused coaching plans and race methods. Analyzing particular person bike splits throughout totally different races can reveal strengths, weaknesses, and the influence of coaching interventions. This data-driven method empowers athletes to optimize pacing, enhance energy output, and finally obtain higher race outcomes. Additional investigation into the connection between bike splits, energy knowledge, and total efficiency may present further insights for enhancing coaching effectiveness and race-day execution.
6. Break up instances (run)
Run break up instances in Ironman 70.3 races signify the ultimate efficiency element and sometimes show decisive in figuring out total outcomes. The 13.1-mile run follows the swim and bike disciplines, testing athletes’ endurance, resilience, and skill to take care of tempo after vital exertion. Analyzing run splits supplies essential insights into pacing methods, fatigue administration, and the correlation between operating efficiency and total race outcomes. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for athletes searching for to optimize race methods and enhance total efficiency.
-
Pacing and Fatigue Administration
Run splits typically reveal how successfully athletes handle fatigue accrued throughout the swim and bike legs. Constant splits counsel well-paced runs and efficient fatigue administration, whereas declining splits might point out struggles with sustaining tempo resulting from accrued fatigue or dietary deficits. For instance, an athlete beginning the run with quick splits however considerably slowing down within the later miles suggests pacing errors early within the run or insufficient fueling throughout the bike leg.
-
Correlation with General Efficiency
Analyzing run splits alongside total ending instances supplies insights into the connection between operating efficiency and race success. A powerful run break up can compensate for a weaker bike leg, whereas a slower run can negate the benefit gained from a quick bike break up. This highlights the significance of balanced coaching throughout all three disciplines. An athlete with a prime bike break up however a bottom-quartile run break up illustrates the necessity for improved run coaching to boost total efficiency.
-
Impression of Prior Disciplines
Run splits mirror the cumulative influence of the swim and bike legs. A very difficult bike course with vital elevation achieve, as an example, may result in slower run splits even amongst sturdy runners. Analyzing run splits within the context of prior disciplines supplies a extra nuanced understanding of efficiency dynamics. A powerful runner experiencing unusually sluggish run splits may analyze the bike course and pacing technique for potential causes.
-
Strategic Issues
Aggressive racing typically entails strategic selections relating to run pacing. Some athletes select to begin conservatively and progressively enhance tempo, whereas others go for a extra aggressive preliminary tempo. Analyzing run splits throughout totally different races and aggressive ranges reveals diversified pacing methods and their influence on outcomes. Evaluating the run splits of prime finishers typically reveals totally different approaches to pacing and highlights the strategic complexity of the run leg.
Analyzing run break up instances supplies a vital understanding of the ultimate stage of Ironman 70.3 races and its influence on total outcomes. By contemplating pacing, fatigue administration, and the affect of prior disciplines, athletes achieve precious insights for optimizing coaching, growing race methods, and enhancing efficiency outcomes. Additional analysis may discover the physiological and psychological components influencing run efficiency after extended exertion within the swim and bike disciplines, providing additional refinement of coaching and racing approaches.
7. General Rankings
General rankings in Ironman 70.3 races present a complete efficiency overview, positioning athletes throughout the complete area of opponents. These rankings, primarily based on complete ending instances, signify a vital metric for evaluating efficiency and understanding the aggressive panorama of every occasion. Analyzing total rankings gives precious insights into particular person achievement, race dynamics, and broader traits throughout the sport. The next aspects illuminate the importance of total rankings throughout the context of Ironman 70.3 outcomes.
-
Figuring out Race Winners
General rankings definitively determine the top-performing athletes in every race, recognizing their achievements and establishing benchmarks for different opponents. The athlete with the quickest total time secures the first-place rating, adopted by subsequent finishers in ascending order of their ending instances. This simple rating system supplies a transparent hierarchy of efficiency and celebrates the best achievers in every competitors.
-
Contextualizing Particular person Efficiency
Whereas age group and gender rankings supply precious comparisons inside particular demographics, total rankings present a broader perspective. An athlete may obtain a excessive age group rating however nonetheless end mid-pack total, providing a practical evaluation of efficiency relative to the complete area. As an illustration, an athlete profitable their age group however ending one centesimal total understands their efficiency throughout the broader aggressive panorama.
-
Analyzing Aggressive Fields
Analyzing total rankings throughout totally different Ironman 70.3 races reveals the depth and competitiveness of every area. A race with a tightly clustered prime ten within the total rankings suggests a extremely aggressive area, whereas a bigger unfold in ending instances may point out a much less aggressive panorama. This evaluation permits athletes to evaluate the relative issue of various races and perceive their efficiency inside various aggressive contexts.
-
Monitoring Efficiency Traits
Analyzing total rating distributions over time reveals efficiency traits throughout the sport. For instance, a constant lower in common ending instances over a number of years suggests enhancing athletic efficiency throughout the sector. Equally, modifications within the density of rankings inside particular time bands can point out shifts within the total aggressive panorama. This longitudinal perspective contributes to a deeper understanding of the game’s evolution and the components influencing efficiency traits.
General rankings, due to this fact, signify a basic aspect of Ironman 70.3 outcomes, providing essential insights into particular person efficiency, race dynamics, and broader traits throughout the sport. By contemplating these rankings alongside age group, gender, and break up instances, a complete understanding of efficiency emerges, offering precious data for athletes, coaches, and fans alike. Additional evaluation involving the comparability of total rankings throughout totally different Ironman 70.3 races worldwide can illuminate variations in aggressive fields and spotlight the affect after all traits and environmental components on efficiency outcomes.
8. Skilled Outcomes
Skilled outcomes inside Ironman 70.3 races signify a vital subset of total outcomes, providing insights into the best ranges of competitors throughout the sport. These outcomes showcase the efficiency of elite athletes, offering benchmarks for aspiring professionals and age-group athletes alike. Evaluation {of professional} outcomes gives a singular perspective on pacing methods, coaching methodologies, and the evolving dynamics of elite-level competitors. Understanding the context and implications {of professional} outcomes enhances comprehension of the broader panorama of Ironman 70.3 racing.
-
Efficiency Benchmarks
Skilled outcomes set up efficiency requirements, offering targets for aspiring professionals and impressive age-group athletes. Analyzing skilled ending instances, break up instances, and pacing methods gives precious insights into what constitutes elite-level efficiency. For instance, analyzing the common bike break up of prime skilled finishers supplies a benchmark for age-group athletes aiming to enhance their biking efficiency. These benchmarks function motivational instruments and inform coaching targets for athletes in any respect ranges.
-
Pacing Methods and Race Dynamics
Skilled races typically unfold in a different way than age-group races. Evaluation {of professional} outcomes reveals subtle pacing methods, aggressive early-race techniques, and dynamic interactions amongst prime contenders. Observing these dynamics supplies insights into optimum race execution on the highest degree. As an illustration, analyzing how skilled athletes handle their effort throughout the three disciplines reveals efficient pacing methods for long-course triathlon racing.
-
Technological and Dietary Developments
Skilled athletes typically function on the slicing fringe of sports activities expertise and vitamin. Analyzing skilled outcomes, mixed with details about their gear and dietary methods, supplies insights into the most recent developments and their potential influence on efficiency. For instance, observing the prevalence of particular bike applied sciences or dietary merchandise amongst prime finishers gives precious data for athletes searching for efficiency positive factors.
-
Evolution of the Sport
Monitoring skilled outcomes over time reveals the evolution of the game. Analyzing traits in ending instances, participation charges, and the dominance of particular athletes or nationalities supplies a historic perspective on the event {of professional} Ironman 70.3 racing. This longitudinal evaluation highlights key modifications and developments throughout the sport, providing precious context for understanding present aggressive landscapes.
By contemplating skilled ends in the context of total Ironman 70.3 outcomes, a deeper appreciation for the complexities and nuances of the game emerges. These outcomes not solely showcase the top of efficiency but in addition supply precious insights for athletes in any respect ranges searching for to enhance their coaching, racing methods, and understanding of the game’s evolution. Additional analysis may discover the precise coaching methodologies employed by skilled athletes, offering extra detailed steering for these aspiring to achieve elite ranges of competitors. Moreover, evaluating skilled outcomes throughout totally different Ironman 70.3 races globally can illuminate variations in course issue and aggressive fields.
9. Qualification Rankings
Qualification rankings signify a vital hyperlink between particular person race efficiency and development to higher-level competitions throughout the Ironman 70.3 sequence. These rankings, derived immediately from Ironman 70.3 race outcomes, decide eligibility for World Championship occasions. Efficiency inside designated age teams at qualifying races dictates an athlete’s standing inside these rankings. A sure variety of qualifying slots, various by race and age group, are allotted primarily based on these rankings, offering pathways for athletes to progress to the world championship degree.
The allocation of World Championship slots primarily based on qualification rankings creates a extremely aggressive panorama inside Ironman 70.3 racing. Athletes typically goal particular qualifying races identified for favorable course circumstances or much less aggressive fields to enhance their probabilities of securing a slot. Efficiency at these qualifying races turns into paramount, because it immediately impacts World Championship aspirations. As an illustration, an athlete persistently putting extremely inside their age group may prioritize a particular qualifying race identified for fewer allotted slots, accepting the elevated competitors for the improved status related to qualifying from a tougher occasion. Conversely, an athlete searching for their first World Championship qualification may goal a race with extra allotted slots, prioritizing qualification over the next rating. These strategic selections spotlight the sensible significance of understanding qualification rankings and their connection to race choice.
Understanding the dynamics of qualification rankings is crucial for athletes aiming to compete on the World Championship degree. Components resembling race choice, constant efficiency inside one’s age group, and consciousness of slot allocation insurance policies all play essential roles in profitable qualification. Evaluation of qualification rankings knowledge, together with historic traits and aggressive landscapes inside particular age teams, supplies precious insights for athletes growing long-term aggressive methods. This understanding empowers athletes to make knowledgeable selections about race choice, coaching prioritization, and finally, the pursuit of World Championship qualification.
Incessantly Requested Questions
This part addresses frequent inquiries relating to knowledge interpretation and evaluation associated to half-Ironman distance triathlon outcomes.
Query 1: How regularly are outcomes up to date following a race?
Official outcomes are usually obtainable inside a couple of hours of the race’s conclusion, though ultimate validation and changes might take barely longer.
Query 2: The place can one discover official race outcomes?
Official Ironman 70.3 race outcomes are printed on the official Ironman web site, usually on the person race pages.
Query 3: What data is usually included in race outcomes?
Race outcomes usually embody total ending instances, break up instances for every leg (swim, bike, run), age group rankings, gender rankings, {and professional} outcomes.
Query 4: How are age group rankings decided?
Age group rankings are primarily based on ending instances inside predetermined five-year age brackets.
Query 5: How are World Championship slots allotted primarily based on race outcomes?
World Championship slots are allotted primarily based on age group rankings at designated qualifying races. The variety of slots varies per race and age group.
Query 6: What components can affect race outcomes past athletic efficiency?
Exterior components resembling climate circumstances (temperature, wind, currents), course variations, and gear decisions can affect race outcomes.
Understanding these elements of Ironman 70.3 outcomes permits for a complete interpretation of race knowledge and supplies precious insights for athletes and fans. Consulting the official Ironman web site for particular race particulars and extra data is really helpful.
The next sections will delve deeper into particular knowledge evaluation methods and discover the strategic implications of race outcomes for coaching and competitors.
Optimizing Efficiency Primarily based on Knowledge Evaluation
Evaluation of race knowledge supplies actionable insights for enhancing efficiency in half-Ironman distance triathlons. The next suggestions supply steering for leveraging these insights successfully.
Tip 1: Establish Limiting Components:
Analyze break up instances throughout a number of races to pinpoint constant weaknesses. A recurring sample of slower bike splits, for instance, highlights a key space for centered coaching. Addressing limiting components yields vital efficiency positive factors.
Tip 2: Benchmark In opposition to Competitors:
Make the most of age-group rankings and total outcomes to gauge efficiency relative to friends and determine lifelike aggressive targets. Understanding one’s aggressive standing informs coaching depth and race methods.
Tip 3: Refine Pacing Methods:
Constant pacing is essential for optimum efficiency. Analyze break up instances inside particular person races to determine pacing inconsistencies and modify methods accordingly. Sustaining even pacing all through the race conserves power and improves total outcomes.
Tip 4: Consider Coaching Effectiveness:
Monitoring efficiency metrics throughout a number of races supplies precious suggestions on coaching effectiveness. Constant enhancements in break up instances or total rankings validate coaching methodologies, whereas stagnant or declining efficiency necessitates changes to coaching plans.
Tip 5: Set Sensible Targets:
Knowledge evaluation facilitates the institution of lifelike efficiency targets. Analyzing previous efficiency knowledge and present health ranges supplies a foundation for setting achievable but difficult targets. Sensible aim setting enhances motivation and focuses coaching efforts.
Tip 6: Strategic Race Choice:
Understanding qualification rankings and aggressive landscapes inside particular races informs strategic race choice. Focusing on races with favorable course circumstances or much less aggressive fields maximizes probabilities of attaining particular efficiency targets, resembling World Championship qualification.
Tip 7: Analyze Course Dynamics:
Researching course profiles and contemplating historic race knowledge for particular venues informs race preparation and pacing methods. Understanding course-specific challenges, resembling elevation modifications or prevailing wind circumstances, permits athletes to tailor coaching and race execution accordingly.
Leveraging these data-driven insights elevates coaching effectiveness, refines race methods, and finally unlocks larger efficiency potential in half-Ironman distance triathlons. Constant evaluation and knowledgeable decision-making are essential for steady enchancment.
The following conclusion synthesizes key ideas offered all through this exploration of aggressive knowledge evaluation throughout the context of Ironman 70.3 racing.
Conclusion
Evaluation of Ironman 70.3 race outcomes supplies athletes and fans with a wealth of actionable data. Examination of ending instances, break up instances throughout swim, bike, and run segments, age group rankings, {and professional} outcomes gives essential insights into efficiency dynamics and aggressive landscapes. Understanding these knowledge factors facilitates focused coaching interventions, refined pacing methods, and knowledgeable race choice, finally contributing to enhanced efficiency outcomes.
Strategic utilization of race knowledge empowers athletes to determine limiting components, benchmark progress towards competitors, and optimize coaching plans. Constant knowledge evaluation fosters steady enchancment, driving particular person achievement throughout the difficult and rewarding realm of half-Ironman distance triathlon. The pursuit of enhanced efficiency depends not solely on bodily prowess but in addition on the insightful interpretation and software of aggressive knowledge.
